Academic Computing Committee

Meeting Minutes

March 5, 2007

 

Members Present:

University Senate Representative: J. Alvares, R. Wolfson

 

Faculty Representatives: C. Du [CSAM Faculty Rep], A. Pemberton [CART Faculty Rep.],

 

Administrative Representatives (Academic Deans): M. Mallery [Library Administrative Rep.], A.J. Kelton [CHSS Administrative Rep. proxy], S. Poger [CEHS Administrative Rep.], J. Youn [CSAM Administrative Rep.], R. Salomon [SBUS Administrative Rep.],  E. Harris [CART Administrative Rep], J. Donadeu [Graduate School Administrative Rep.], P. Kahn (proxy for Associate Vice President for Information Technology)

 

Non-voting Members Present: E. Chapel, OIT; T. Devlin (Academic Coordinator of Education Computing Network)

 

Guests: J. O’Brien

 

Absent:. S. Sotillo [CHSS Faculty Rep.], S. Shapiro [Library Faculty Rep.], R. Xing [SBUS Faculty Rep].,   D. Stevens [Undergraduate Student Rep], A. Mohiuddin [Graduate Student Rep.], VACANT [Undergrad. Student Rep.], VACANT [CEHS Faculty Rep.]

 

Presiding: J. Youn, Deputy Chair

Reporting: M. Mallery, Secretary

Distribution: ACC Web at http://frontpage.montclair.edu/acc/

Convened: 3:08 p.m. [University Hall UH5013]

Adjourned: 4:52 p.m.

 

1. Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 3:08 p.m. when there was a quorum.

 

2. Minutes: Members approved the ACC Minutes of the February 12th meeting unanimously. Chapel will share with ACC members his February email to Kasner referenced in the ACC February Minutes under the Chair's Report to clarify that Chapel's suggestion was to use a chargeback recovery system to handle the question of having one MSU purchasing agent for software and route all purchases through a single account. 

 

3. Announcements:

 

Salomon announced that this is Business Week at SBUS, an event for MSU graduating seniors; alumni will be visiting the campus and touring University Hall.

 

Mallery announced that the Middle States Visiting Committee for MSU arrived yesterday and established their headquarters in the Library’s Special Collections Room.

 

Chapel announced that the MSU Information Technology Group has applied for the Archi-Tech Award for their ground-breaking work in technology integration in University Hall.

 

4. Reports

• Chair's Report: Youn reported that Kasner had not received a response from the CEHS Dean on the ACC request for a faculty representative.  Poger will follow up with the CEHS Dean to ask again for a CEHS faculty representative to the ACC.

 

Youn reported that Kasner will continue to collect feedback on the proposed MSU Responsible Computing Policy.  Please send any comments directly to Kasner for compilation on Monday, March 19th.  Alvares also asked that faculty members should identify the committee they serve on when commenting on the policy.

 

• OIT Report: 

a) Bell Tower Initiative:

Chapel reported on the new MSU Bell Tower Initiative to replace the outdated SCTPlus campus management system. The official kickoff of the Bell Tower Initiative will be March 12th.  Chapel presented an overview of the Initiative, and noted that the RFP process will involve everyone at MSU.  There will be seven functional project teams that align with each of the major modules of the system:

1) Admissions and Recruitment

2) Student Information

3) Enterprise Integration

4) Human Resources

5) Finance and Budget

6) Institutional Advancement

7) Third Party Applications and Portal

 

Chapel noted that ACC members will be called to serve on these project teams. Alvares asked are we researching comparable institutions and their choices of campus management systems?  Chapel answered that a comprehensive scan of other institutions had been completed, and a large decision matrix is in place for each project team.

 

Chapel said that there will be five phases to the project:

1) Planning and Preparation

2) RFP Development

3) Bid Analysis

4) Contract Award

5) Implementation

 

Chapel noted that the timeline for the project goes out to January 2008 for the contract bid, and it is estimated that the full system will take five years from launch to completion.  The cost is estimated to be eight to eleven million dollars.

 

Alvares noted that there were previous committees charged in past years to choose a campus management system, and Chapel said that some of these committees will become part of the new project teams. 

 

b) “Proposed Changes to Anti-SPAM Service: Quarantining Messages Ranked 80% or Higher:” 

After review of the ACC February discussion on Anti-SPAM quarantining at 80%, Kahn said she will resend to the ACC listserv her responses to the request for the revised OIT Equipment Replacement Chart and answers to the Anti-SPAM Filtering questions which she sent on February 21st when the MSU lyris listserv was down. 

 

Chapel asked if there were objections to moving the SPAM-blocking threshold to 80%. The consensus was that the ACC does not object to the 80% threshold, but Kelton recommended that OIT notify faculty of the threshold change before implementing it.  Salomon asked how can users recover email that is missed?  Kahn said that users can read from email responses if they choose the Digest mode.  Youn noted that OIT should recommend that users leave the default on so they can choose the Digest mode.

 

c) Alvares asked for an update on the Rave wireless project on campus. Chapel responded that he and Kathleen Ragan of MSU presented on the Rave wirless project at EDUCAUSE 2006 in Dallas under the title, "Montclair State University Unplugged: Replacing Landlines with a Cellular Information Device."  The next step for the MSU Rave wireless proejct will be integration of academic use applications, and Chapel said he would be happy to speak about this at a future ACC meeting if we place it on the agenda.

 

• Ad Hoc Committee Reports:

 

a) Learning Management Subcommittee (LMS): Kahn reported that the February meeting of the LMS Committee was postponed until March. Mallery will remind Shapiro, the ACC Webmaster, to post LMS meeting summaries from Kahn on the Action Issues page at: http://frontpage.montclair.edu/acc/action_issues.htm 

 

b) Campus-Wide User Satisfaction Survey Subcommittee: Kelton thanked the ACC members for moving the Survey forward so effectively in February.  After Steve Johnson modifies the survey text to reflect ACC members' revisions and comments, Kelton will pass the revised Campus-Wide User Satisfaction Survey on to the Senate for their approval.

 

5.  Old Business

a) Adobe Licensing Pilot Program:

Youn reported that he has not had time to work on this program, but he will send out an email requesting responses from any MSU faculty or staff who have current plans for upgrading their Adobe software.  Youn requested that ACC members send him names of any Adobe software users that they know of to help him get started. Youn will work on the Adobe pilot project for presentation at the April ACC meeting.

 

b) MSU Policy on Responsible Use of University Computing Resources:

Youn reported that Kasner continues to solicit comments on the proposed policy from OIT.  Alvares reported that, after discussion of the ACC motion to form a Senate subcommittee on the policy, the Senate requested that the ACC draft a policy for their approval. Wolfson moved that:

***

A subcommittee of the ACC will be formed to revise and update the MSU Guidelines for Responsible Computing into a policy that serves the current needs of the institution.

***

 

After discussion, the motion passed with 6 votes.  Alvares nominated Wolfson as Chair.  Wolfson will send an email to the ACC listserv to solicit members for the new subcommittee.  Wolfson will convene the subcommittee before the April ACC meeting.  Chapel noted that OIT is willing to work with this subcommittee on modifying the policy.

 

6. New Business:

a) Statistics Packages – Kelton reported that a faculty member who uses SPSS statistical software constantly in classes has found that the student version of SPSS does not allow students to do their work and hinders their learning experience.  He asked if MSU could get a license for the full version of SPSS for the students.  Salomon noted that some SBUS students use SPSS and some use SAS for statistical research.  Alvares noted that students have access to SPSS in computer labs on campus.  Kelton said that students had trouble working in computer labs, and the question was brought forward as a problem in teaching and learning, not computer labs. Wolfson noted that Indiana U. has a license where each user can lease SPSS for $25 for one year. Chapel answered that they probably negotiated this price on the basis of the information that they had enough licenses.  MSU does not have this information.

 

b) EndNoteKelton reported that many faculty in CHSS buy individual licenses for EndNote citation and bibliography building software, and asked if it might be more cost-effective for MSU to purchase a campus license to EndNote.  Poger noted that many faculty in CEHS also have this problem with buying individual licenses to Adobe products. Pemberton said that he had been told to buy software from the Bookstore, which opened up problems because students wanted CART to buy the software for them.

 

Chapel asked whether these software packages (SPSS, EndNote and Adobe) were needed for class use in computer labs or available to the entire campus population.   Alvares answered that the software was used in many different places and emphasized that the survey will give us more information about software purchasing on campus.

 

Chapel felt that the notion of a clearing-house account works better for purchasing software. If the ACC keeps researching pricing options, we will only end up with different answers from different vendors.  MSU needs to filter these options into a single accounting mechanism.  Kelton asked where will the clearing-house be housed at MSU.  Chapel volunteered OIT because they buy the site licenses for MSU now.

 

After discussion, Chapel recommended that the ACC apply the principle of setting up a single account for software purchase to the Adobe software purchases first and then consider the uses and licensing options for the other software packages, such as SPSS, EndNote, etc.  Youn said he will gather the information about the Adobe software products on campus and find out possible group and/or campus licensing options and report at the April ACC meeting.

 

c) Next Meeting:

The next ACC meeting is scheduled for Monday, April 9th, in the Library's Special Collections Room starting at 3PM.

 

7. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 4:52 PM.