Academic Computing Committee
Meeting Minutes
October 18, 2004



Members Present:
University Senate Representatives: J. Alvares, M. Heller

Faculty Representatives: A. Adarkar [CHSS Faculty Rep.], A. Koeller (CSAM), S. Shapiro [Library Faculty Rep.],R. Xing [SBUS Faculty Rep.]

Administrative Representatives (Academic Deans): A.  Pemberton [SART Faculty Rep.], E. Mayfield [CHSS Administrative Rep.], M. Mallery [Library Dean Administrative Rep.], J. Hunt [Library Dean], L. Jenkins [CEHS Administrative Rep.], R. Salomon [Proxy for Dean Alan Oppenheim]

Non-voting Members Present: R. Wolfson, Local 1904 Observer
Absent:  M. Davidson [CEHS Faculty Rep.], J. Gaynor [University Senate Rep.], K. O’Halloran [Graduate School Administrative Rep], R. Julian Robinson [SART Administrative Rep.], D. Stevens [Undergraduate Student Rep.], T. Devlin, Academic Coordinator of Education Computing Network, VACANT, Associate Director of Information Technology, Student Representatives: VACANT (undergraduate), VACANT (graduate), M. Kruge [CSAM Administrative Rep.], E. Chapel, Associate Vice president for Information Technology

Guest:  J. Minier
  
Presiding: M. Heller, Chair Pro Tem; J. Alvares, Chair
Reporting: M. Mallery, Secretary
Distribution: ACC Web at http://frontpage.montclair.edu/acc 
Convened: 3:08 p.m. [Library Special Collections
   Room]
Adjourned: 4:40 p.m.

1. Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 3:08 p.m.

2. Minutes: There was no quorum, so the approval of the minutes for Sept. 13 were deferred until the next meeting on November 8. 

3. Announcements: No announcements.
4. Reports
    • Chair's Report: Chair Pro Tem Heller reported that Jean Alvares was appointed as a Faculty Senate Representative to the ACC and accepted the nomination for ACC Chair.  The election was carried out over the ACC listserv, and the results are unanimous that Alvares is elected as Chair. Alvares had a class and could not arrive until 3:30PM.

Alvares reported that the Provost announced at the October University Senate meeting that he was forming a Blackboard Advisory Group (BAG), which consists of 3 faculty members appointed by the University Senate, 3 faculty members appointed by the Provost, the Director of Instructional Technology, a Technology Coordinator, the Chair of the ACC, the Chair of the Carnegie Committee and an undergraduate representative appointed by the SGA. The BAG met for the first time on Oct. 14 to discuss policy issues.    Wolfson suggested that MSU could have a Town Meeting on Technology and Pedagogy in the future.

Alvares attended the Oct. 14th BAG meeting and reported that they addressed the following six points that the Provost presented:

How should MSU BlackBoard handle:
1) old course information,
2) course availability requirements,
3) cancelled and inactive courses,
4) incomplete grades,
5) additional media, and
6) training for new faculty.

There was some discussion of the onsite storage for old Bb information; Alvares recommends permanent storage for all Bb information. Salomon noted that there are some new applications in the next level of Bb release that should be considered in this discussion.

Heller recommended that Alvares take back to the BAG (next meeting Oct. 28th):
*MSU should leverage its institutional investment in the SAN (Storage Architecture Network) to archive Bb file systems daily; and
*Bb should have SCORM compliance for interoperability with other course management systems (including open source systems).

Minier noted that several of these issues have been ongoing for many semesters.  Some of these issues require an answer before the end of the semester because they are contractual, and some will be addressed in the next release of the Bb software.  Alvares said that he has invited Patty Kahn to come to a future ACC meeting to demo the next Bb release.

Alvares requested that ACC members email Bb issues to him, and he will summarize for the BAG and the next ACC meeting. 

    • OIT Report: There was no representative from IT present to report. The members of the ACC asked for an update on the Help Desk Support Survey, conducted last Spring, with attention to any follow-up actions taken on the recommendations from the Survey.  Adarkar requested that OIT report on the status of the campus cell phone project.  Koeller noted that that in the Montclarion of Oct. 7th there were articles on iPrint and netDrive applications on campus, and he asked for a report on these initiatives also.

• Ad Hoc Committee Reports:

   a) Mandatory MSU NetID Registration and Use: Heller (Co-Chair) and Youn (Co-Chair) will present the Committee's report at the February 7, 2005 ACC meeting.

   b) Wireless Implementation at MSU: Pemberton (Chair) presented the results of the "Survey on the Future Use of Wireless Technologies at Montclair State University" based on a survey taken in April, 2004.  The survey was sent out to all faculty from the Provost's office, and there were 39 responses.  Pemberton noted that some of the comments were not relevant to wireless technology (see especially Comments to Question #6), which indicates a need for education of faculty on what wireless is.  Minier said that the annual Harris survey for the campus will include questions on wireless use in the add-on questions.  Heller recommended that because there is no quorum and the IT representative is absent that the ACC should table discussion of the survey until the next meeting in November.

   c) Student Technology Survey: Kelton (Chair) will report at the next meeting.

5. Ongoing Business:

a. Technology Initiatives for Persons with Disabilities Ad Hoc Committee: Shapiro (Chair) posted the white paper approved at the May 10 ACC on the ACC Web site.  Heller will convene a subcommittee to write a cover memo for sending the white paper to the University Senate in hopes that it will inform next year’s budget.
 
   b.  MSU Web Guidelines:  The MSU Web Standards and Guidelines at: http://www.montclair.edu/msuweb/ were discussed. Alvares recommended that the Web standards should also include Blackboard standards. Pemberton asked about hosting student films on the MSU Web.  Koeller noted that the Computer Science Department uses cs.montclair.edu.  Heller suggested that there should be a way for departments at MSU to use the motnclair.edu domain. 

   c. Meeting Dates and Times:  Alvares requested that the meeting time for the remaining 2004-2005 ACC meeting schedule be changed to begin at 3:30PM.  Adarkar Moved for the change, and Koeller seconded.  Since there was no quorum, the vote was deferred to email.  Discussion will take place on the ACC listserv.  The proposed change is:

     * Nov. 8 3:30-5:30PM: Library Spec. Collections Room
     * Dec. 13 3:30-5:30PM: Library Spec. Collections Room
     * Feb. 7 3:30-5PM: Library Spec. Collections Room
     * April 11 3-5PM::30 Library Spec. Collections Room
     * May 9 3:30-5:30PM: Library Spec. Collections Room

6. New Business:
   Alvares asked that ACC members come to the next meeting with suggestions for new items for discussion with an emphasis on a proactive approach to technology issues.  Some suggestions were:
   * Reports on EDUCAUSE from ACC attendees;
   * Follow-up on EdTeXPo demos and discussion, e.g., David Pogue spoke about instant messaging use in classrooms; 
   *Koeller suggested discussion of NAB planning for instructional technology safety and security, such as laptop use;
   *Wolfson asked for an update on the laptop initiative proposed in the MSU Strategic Plan.  Salomon noted that SBUS has a laptop initiative.  Alvares suggested that we have representatives from Seton Hall come and speak to MSU faculty about the benefits of their laptop initiative. Hunt suggested that the ACC address the need for training students who have never used a computer; could this be part of the laptop initiative?

Alvares noted that all academic computing questions should have planning and asked that the ACC try to stay a step ahead of issues that will come up with systems as OIT proposes them.

7. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 4:40 PM.