Academic Computing Committee
Meeting Minutes

November 8, 2004



Members Present:
University Senate Representatives: J. Alvares, M. Heller

Faculty Representatives: A. Adarkar [CHSS Faculty Rep.], A. Koeller (CSAM), S. Shapiro [Library Faculty Rep.], R. Xing [SBUS Faculty Rep.]

Administrative Representatives (Academic Deans): A.  Pemberton [SART Faculty Rep.], A.J. Kelton [CHSS Administrative Rep.], M. Mallery [Library Dean Administrative Rep.], J. Hunt [Librayr Dean], K. Tighe [CEHS Administrative Rep.], R. Salomon [Proxy for Dean Alan Oppenheim], ), J. Youn [proxy for M. Kruge, CSAM Administrative Rep.], Ayesha [Graduate Student Rep.]

Non-voting Members Present: R. Wolfson, Local 1904 Observer

Absent:  M. Davidson [CEHS Faculty Rep.], J. Gaynor [University Senate Rep.], K. O’Halloran [Graduate School Administrative Rep], R. Julian Robinson [SART Administrative Rep.], D. Stevens [Undergraduate Student Rep.], T. Devlin, Academic Coordinator of Education Computing Network, VACANT, Associate Director of Information Technology, Student Representatives: VACANT (undergraduate), E. Chapel, Associate Vice president for Information Technology

Guest:  J. Minier
  
Presiding: J. Alvares, Chair
Reporting: M. Mallery, Secretary
Distribution: ACC Web at http://frontpage.montclair.edu/acc 
Convened: 3:07 p.m. [Library Special Collections
   Room]
Adjourned: 4:56 p.m.

1. Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 3:07 p.m.

2. Minutes: Minutes for Sept. 13 and October 18 were approved. 

3. Announcements: On Friday, December 10th, Montclair Sate U. is hosting the New Jersey Blackboard Users Group.

4. Reports
    • Chair's Report: Chair Alvares introduced the new Graduate Student Representative.  There was some discussion about proxy voting and what to do to ensure that there is a quorum present for moving on actions at ACC meetings.  Kelton noted that on the October 18 meeting date, many ACC members were attending EDUCAUSE.  Mallery reported that the last time there was no quorum was when the ACC was scheduled for Easter Monday.  The decision was to continue with prior voting procedures, and Alvares will contact members who are chronically absent to request that they find a replacement.

Alvares attended the October 28th meeting of the MSU Blackbaord Advisory Group (BAG), where there was a demo of the new Blackboard Content Management System (see http://www.blackboard.com ).  Salomon reported that putting documents into the system is seamless with the CMS, the editing feature is also easy, and it makes Blackboard more of a portal.  Storage space is still an issue with the CMS, however. 

There was discussion as to whether it would be cheaper for Blackboard to be hosted on MSU servers.  Kelton noted that MSU would need 24/7 technical support in place to host Bb.  Heller said that the SAN could be used to host Bb, and it is preferable for Bb to be hosted on campus.  Salomon noted that Bb was down the previous week because of remote issues at Bb.  Koeller asked for the status of the SAN from OIT.

Alvares noted that Bb archiving issues were also discussed at BAG.  Minier said that currently archiving is cumbersome, and the new CMS system would make it easier.  Youn asked if there are policies and procedures for what is appropriate for archiving on Bb.  Alvares said that the question of what to do with old courses is not clear. 

Minier noted that BAG is a temporary advisory group that will disband when its function is completed. Alvares reported that the Faculty Senate has asked the ACC to establish a subcommittee to address Blackboard procedures and questions.  See below under New Business for the Bb Subcommittee volunteers and further actions recommended.  Kelton said Bb complaints have been building up over time and should be dealt with on a more timely basis.  This subcommittee could assess actions recommended.  Pemberton added that MSU needs a clearinghouse for complaints about Bb.

• OIT Report: There was no representative from IT present to report.

• Ad Hoc Committee Reports:

   a) Mandatory MSU NetID Registration and Use: Heller (Co-Chair) and Youn (Co-Chair) will present the Committee's report at the February 7, 2005 ACC meeting.

   b) Wireless Implementation at MSU: Pemberton (Chair) presented the results of the "Survey on the Future Use of Wireless Technologies at Montclair State University" based on a survey taken in April, 2004.  Discussion was postponed until next ACC meeting.

   c) Student Technology Survey: Kelton (Chair) will report at the next meeting.

5. Ongoing Business:

a. Technology Initiatives for Persons with Disabilities Ad Hoc Committee: Shapiro (Chair) posted the white paper approved at the May 10 ACC on the ACC Web site.  Shapiro has drafted the cover memo and will send the white paper to the University Senate for their action on the ACC recommendations.
 
b. Meeting Dates and Times:  Alvares requested that the meeting time for the remaining 2004-2005 ACC meeting schedule be changed to begin at 3:30PM at the October meeting, but ACC members noted that their schedules for the Fall semester are already set.  ACC Meetings will continue to begin at 3:00PM. 

6. New Business:
a. Blackboard Subcommittee: The following ACC members volunteered to be on a new Subcommittee to discuss Blackboard implementation as well as mediated classroom planning and implementation at MSU:

Jean Alvares
Roger Salomon
Michael Heller
Andreas Koeller

Rich Wolfson noted that the subcommittee membership does not have to be limited to ACC members.  It was also recommended that Patty Kahn should be a resource person for this subcommittee.  Alvares will invite Susan Hussein to become a member, and send out an invitiation for subcommittee members on the Blackboard listserv.  Alvares will follow up with the Faculty Senate on this initiative.

b. Computer Repair and Replacement Policy: Wolfson distributed notes from the Faculty Senate Administrative Affairs Council for a draft Computer Repair and Replacement Policy.  The Senate requested that the ACC develop a repair policy promptly.  There was some discussion about the policy the AAC drafted.  Youn said that “24-hour response time” needs to be clarified; also, the applications supported should be listed.  Wolfson noted that the definition of negligence is not clear.  Kelton recommended that there are other institutions with a repair policy in place, and that MSU might find a good model policy. Based on these comments, Wolfson will draft a revised Computer Repair and Replacement Policy and send it to the ACC via the listserv for approval. 
 
7. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 4:56 PM.